Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by motoxpro 168 days ago
I am not understanding how this is bad. Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants. Or is that the whole reason?
4 comments

> a guy made a bunch of money

Through the systemic abuse and exploitation of countless individuals' privacy and autonomy. The context is everything.

The 'how' matters.
Right now he's mostly spending it on weapons and AI to control people
> Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants.

A guy has woken up to the fact that he'll be remembered as a villian and is trying to whitewash his reputation.

I don’t know that the vast majority of Americans know who Eric Schmidt is. And unless they find little green men, no one will care about this project, so it won’t affect his (essentially nonexistent) reputation.

It’s not unlike if you had a blog post about a gardening project in your backyard. Perhaps interesting to gardeners, but approximately no one cares.

Low effort cynicism.

I forget why he’s a villain. Did he do something at Google?

He’s sort of a lesser known figure to me.

Eric Schmidt is, in his own words, an arms dealer now and is driving the R&D of autonomous A.I. weapons.
For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.
> For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.

Speak for yourself. I'm a non-pacifist, and I think "autonomous A.I. weapons" are a nightmare.

Sure, all lethal weapons are a horrific nightmare on some level.

But you also have to keep in mind that China, Russia and Hamas will gladly develop them anyway. Until we've figured out the worldwide peace thing, we need to keep running the race, awful as it is.

Apparently, none of them have seen any of the Terminator movies.
Maybe they wear two million sunblock?
I would go even further: Not only the vast majority, but 100% of non pacifist like AI weapons.
For the bottom 99.9% of wealthy people, it is not a good thing.
He was responsible for a bunch of the anticompetitive hiring agreements with Jobs at Apple and he’s a fairly well known lothario, but otherwise benign IMO considering his competition at that wealth level.
He is also the man who said ”If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.” as if people are not being hunted for being LGBTQ even in the west, or persecutions of various kinds are a thing of the past, or spousal abuse doesn’t matter.
It worked for Alfred Nobel.
It seems to have worked for Bill Gates as well. He definitely did some not so nice things when starting and running MS - I think it unfortunately goes with the territory of running a successful company at scale. But subsequently he has become more know for his philanthropy.