|
|
|
|
|
|
by hirvi74
167 days ago
|
|
|
(Not the user you were replying to) If Rust is no less safe than C in such a regard, then what benefit is Rust providing that C could not? I am genuinely curious because OS development is not my forte. I assume the justification to implement Rust must be contingent on more than Rust just being 'newer = better', right? |
|
|