[mmooss]

> Because one could "simply" ask a different LLM to neutrally evaluate the conversation / conversational snippets.

The problem is using LLMs beyond a limited scope, which is free ideas but not reliable reasoning or, goodness forbid, decision-making.

Maybe the model for LLMs is a very good, sociopathic sophist or liar. They know a lot of 'facts', true or false, and are can con you out of your car keys (or house or job). Sometimes you catch them at a lie and their dishonesty becomes transparent. They have good ideas, though their usefulness only enhances their con jobs. (They also tell everything you say with others.)

Would you rely on them for something of any importance? Simply ask a human.