|
|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
171 days ago
|
|
|
Mm. I think "any" update would be sufficient for 95% of cases, doesn't have to be high-quality. Even if it's just the copyright date changing at least once per year, that tells you one specific named entity is claiming to care about it: when nobody does even that much, everyone automatically has the right to do whatever they want with the software. Which reminds me, I need to update the copyright date on my website… |
|
|