[tangue]

It's pleasant to the eyes but :

- "Free" is not the kind of license I trust (there's a guy talking about his stealed code on HN this sunday, just check)

- Not responsive ? Come on we're in 2012

- It would be better if it was hosted on github (or bitbucket). So everyone could improve it (but again what's the license ?) There's a lot of competition in this field and at this stage I don't see any valid reason to use this one, rather than say Bootstrap, Foundation or Skeleton.

[arunoda]

I think they don't mean to give it away free in the long run. They did it for redactor[1] too. (I think it is the full featured awesome and simple WYSIWYG editor)

It's totally upto the developer to decide upon on the licence. There are lot of projects under FREE, but not open sourced.

[1] - http://imperavi.com/redactor/

[ericcholis]

One of the examples shows the responsive features: http://imperavi.com/kube/demo/

[tangue]

...And it works pretty well. I apologize

[paulgb]

I emailed the authors about a week ago and Alex clarified that free to them means it can be redistributed freely. I agree that an actual license would be reassuring though.

[parmgrewal]

Yes, you are absolutely right about license. Even i was reading that article (Tax_Cloud one right?).