[jacquesm]

> No need to discuss further if that's going to turn into this.

Into what? A discussion where one party berates another for not appreciating the 'wishes of the people in Taiwan'?

You can't credibly make that claim without being transparent about your own nationality.

[sa1L]

He said he was looking at history and present reality in the most factual way. Perhaps for you, your identity shapes your viewpoint more than the facts do. Why don't you provide your arguments instead of questioning his nationality?

[jacquesm]

A properly aged account that suddenly springs to life without ever before having commented on anything or submitted a single link. What a joyful occasion.

[sa1L]

I usually prefer reading perspectives over expressing my own, but your bias and ill intentions have compelled me to speak up.

[jacquesm]

Sure...