[elemdos]

I think it’s probably counterproductive. It’s like religion - there’s arguably a lot to be gained from it, but people form negative early experiences and associate them with the thing itself. I’d love to re-read The Great Gatsby but dont want to relive middle school.

[aebtebeten]

I think it's intentional. Going back and rereading both 1984 and Brave New World as an adult made me realize how awful my english teachers' interpretations ("fantastic dystopias" instead of "mirrors of then-current society") had been. Give them to kids who don't have the life experience to interpret them for themselves, and you can make people believe they know what Orwell and Huxley were writing about...

[spragl]

Its different for different children. Some of them understand more than you think, most of them dont.

I think that reading the classics can be beneficial to the first type. But some of the classics can be very bleak. Its not fair to the children to make them read those. 1984 is probably in this category. Read Animal Farm instead. It is also better for the second type of children.

If done properly, and in moderation, I think reading classics is beneficial.

[bell-cot]

> Going back an rereading ... made me realize how awful my english teachers' interpretations ...

Consider that a final lesson. Both about how much you've changed since high school, and about the career-ending downside to teaching kids that current society already is pretty damn dystopian.

[aebtebeten]

> career-ending downside

Yeah, even if it provides minimal didactic value I guess K-12 is at least a twelve year apprenticeship in how to tolerate the sort of hierarchical environments in which both the inmates and their keepers would much rather be doing just about anything else?

[sometimes_all]

> but dont want to relive middle school

I did not think it'd be this horrifying!