Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hsbauauvhabzb 163 days ago
That’s an odd response. My point was GDP alone is a poor way to measure a country.
1 comments

It's a measure of the economy.
Or a measure of quality of life. But it sounds like you’re only interested in pro-American talking points.
It's nearly impossible to measure quality of life, because everybody has a different idea of what that means.
You mean like the human development index and various other measurement techniques?
Which is more important to your quality of life - central heating, or indoor plumbing?
Germany has all three. I’m not sure what your point is.
GDP PPP per capita is better measure of quality of life.
it's not. An economy where only a select few benefit from the GDP (e.g. via stocks - the richest 10% of Americans own 93% of the stocks!) is not a "quality of life" measure at all.

[1] https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market...

You can select yourself as a beneficiary by buying stocks. With Robinhood, you can do so with less than a C-note.

> the richest 10% of Americans own 93% of the stocks

Most prolly got that way by buying stocks!

It's not a good one though, because weird effects like the AI bubble incest investment web artificially blow up the GDP, and because it doesn't reflect the economy "feeling" the population experiences.

To expand on the latter point - say you have automation enabling more economic growth. A significant amount of people lose their jobs, others are afraid they'll be the next ones on the chopping block, and people hold their money together as a result - if you ask general people on the street or in representative surveys, you'll get the feedback that the economy is going to the dogs, but "the numbers" don't reflect that.

Here in Washington state, they are heaping taxes on us in unprecedented amounts. That's not going to help affordability at all.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/washington-states-tax-blitz-497e...