|
|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
166 days ago
|
|
|
> If we're talking about genuine CSAM, that very different and not even limited to undressing. Why would you think I was talking about anything else? Also, "subset" != "very different" > What the former want is not illegal. So the fact they are a minority is irrelevent. Minorites have rights too. This is newsworthy because non-consensual undressing of images of a minor, even by an AI, already passes the requisite threshold in law and by broad social agreement. This is not a protected minority. |
|
|
Because this thread shows CSAM confused with other, e.g. simple child pornography.
And even the source of the quote isn't helping. Clicking its https://www.iwf.org.uk/ "Find out why we use the term ‘child sexual abuse’ instead of ‘child pornography’." gives 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied.
Fortunately a good explanation of the difference can be found here: https://www.thorn.org/blog/ai-generated-child-sexual-abuse-t...
> This is newsworthy because non-consensual undressing of images of a minor, even by an AI
That's not the usage in question. The usage is "generate realistic pictures of undressed minors". Undressing images of real people is prohibited.