[tim333]

Yeah but if you take an honest look Zelensky was elected with 73% of the vote so probably a legitimate ruler. The Venezuela election seems to have been about "Maduro had in fact won just 30% of the vote, compared with 67% for González" so González, the proxy for Machado should have been the winner. (source https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/10/gonzal...)

These things are messy.

[int_19h]

And why does US have to be involved in any of that?

If we really want to "promote democracy" so badly, let's start with Saudi Arabia.

[tim333]

Well, there's the these things are messy issues. No doubt the US invading Venezuela and not Saudi are somewhat oil related.

[tonyedgecombe]

Are you proposing the US invades Saudi Arabia?

[int_19h]

I'm proposing that we don't invade anything.

But if we're going to invade some country on the grounds of making it into a democracy, one does have to wonder why we don't start with the countries that are very proudly and openly not democracies.

[stoneforger]

These are the bad non-democracies. There are good non-democracies too. Are you being critical of good non-democracies? Maybe you are living in a bad non-democracy and can't tell the difference, you might get invaded and enlightened any time soon.

[chronos00]

I agree Zelensky is a legitmate ruler.

But the Russian narrative would be that Viktor Yanukovych was ousted by the Ukraine Parliament in 2014 in what Putin described as a "coup". So Moscow will allege that any president from a future election is illegimate.

Just listened to the Trump press conference, it seems Machado won't be involved in the US-led transition government. He said she is deeply unpopular in Venezuela and it wouldn't work. Conversations are developing between Sec.State Rubio and Venezuela VP Delcy Rodriguez who is Acting President.

This situation feels messier by the minute.