[sarchertech]

Distance education is a tiny percentage of higher education though. Online classes at a local university are more common, but you can still bring the students in for proctored exams.

Even for distance education though, proctored testing centers have been around longer than the internet.

[aaplok]

> Distance education is a tiny percentage of higher education though.

It is about a third of the students I teach, which amounts to several hundreds per term. It may be niche, but it is not insignificant, and definitely a problem for some of us.

> Even for distance education though, proctored testing centers have been around longer than the internet.

I don't know how much experience you have with those. Mine is extensive enough that I have a personal opinion that they are not scalable (which is the focus of the comment I was replying to). If you have hundreds of students disseminated around the world, organising a proctored exam is a logistical challenge.

It is not a problem at many universities yet, because they haven't jumped on the bandwagon. However domestic markets are becoming saturated, visas are harder to get for international students, and there is a demand for online education. I would be surprised that it doesn't develop more in the near future.

[sarchertech]

I agree that proctoring across hundreds of locations globally could be a challenge.

I think the end result though is that schools either limit their students to a smaller number of locations where they can have proctored exams, or they don’t and they effectively lose their credentialing value.