[ErroneousBosh]

No, it's not "restoring detail". The information is gone.

It is predicting what the information might maybe have been like.

[memoriuaysj]

you are arguing with math proofs here, the information is not gone, if it was a real video (as opposed to adversarily generated video)

[ErroneousBosh]

I'm struggling with the idea that you can use maths to recover information from a video that simply was not present in the video.

I get that what you're describing can statisically "unblur" stuff you've blurred with overly-simplistic algorithms.

I can provide you with real-world footage that has "natural" motion blur in it, if you can demonstrate this technique working? I'd really like to see how it's done.