Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by f30e3dfed1c9 168 days ago
This comparison of dogs to AI seems confused, inapt, and unhelpful.

First, "[dogs are] just property" is wrong on the facts. There are probably hundreds of millions of dogs in the world that are not pets (often called "free range dogs") and are no one's "property." This is probably in the ballpark of half of all dogs.

Pet dogs are not generally seen primarily as property. For example, if you were walking down the street in your neighborhood and saw someone in their driveway disassembling a bicycle and discarding the parts, you probably wouldn't think twice about it. Dismembering a dog is an entirely different thing and doing so to a live dog would be a crime in many jurisdictions.

Dogs are inarguably conscious and sentient. An "AI" is not.

Unlike dogs, a running AI is inarguably property. The software may or may not have some "open" license, but the hardware it runs on is, beyond a doubt, someone's property. No hardware, no "AI."

Pulling the plug on a running AI has no ethical implications.

1 comments

In general, under law, dogs are considered property. That's just a fact. It doesn't mean you can be cruel to 'em, but, under most law, they're still property.

The original piece was about Claude having a soul, about a belief that some people consider AI to be "conscious and aware", and how certain people are beginning to treat it more like a person than a machine. Unplugging a computer is unremarkable, but pulling the plug on a "person" most certainly has ethical implications.

"In general, under law, dogs are considered property. That's just a fact."

No. Again, this is obviously wrong on the facts. There are hundreds of millions of dogs in the world that are no one's property and that are not considered property by any law.

This is why I say the comparison is deeply confused and unhelpful. It starts with a statement about dogs being "property" that is obviously wrong and then completely ignores the fact that a running AI is someone's property.

If you want to get anywhere, you've got to drop the comparison with dogs and deal with the fact that an AI is someone's property.

very droll