[fc417fc802]

Approximately, if the user doesn't have root then there's no way to trick them. They also can't access internal app files which gives app authors tight control over how their software is used.

That's the security model. Giving users root breaks both of those assumptions, hence it breaks the security model.

Notice that it is clearly in the best interests of users to at least have this option. But modern BigTech operating systems are designed around corporate interests, not yours. And security professionals seem to prefer to ignore inconvenient things like user freedom.

[bgbntty2]

> Approximately, if the user doesn't have root then there's no way to trick them.

So not having root (somehow?) prevents phishing and tricking? That doesn't seem useful or relevant for people who know what they're doing. If I'm wrong, please elaborate.

> They also can't access internal app files which gives app authors tight control over how their software is used.

I read that in the security model and I don't care for it. App authors shouldn't have any control over how their software is used. In my opinion, of course, but for my computers my opinion is what matters.

[fc417fc802]

I agree with you of course. The thing I find frustrating is the willingness of the GrapheneOS (and to a lesser extent LineageOS) devs to toe the corporate line, accepting anti-user-freedom bullshit in the name of this non-security.

> trick them [ into granting root ]

Apologies for the ambiguity.