[stackghost]

>Why don't we age gate hands?

Making this sort of reductio ad absurdum doesn't make you seem witty or clever. It just makes you seem pedantic and unable to reason about things like a functioning adult.

[ndsipa_pomu]

I don't think you're adding anything to this discussion with that kind of comment.

The idea of age-gating hands is to demonstrate that overly broad age gating IS ridiculous and the lack of sufficient targetting by Texas is precisely why the judge is throwing it out.

Please try to engage with commenters with a little bit more respect and hopefully better understanding.

[antonvs]

That might be the case if they weren't correct. I notice you didn't actually say anything about what's wrong with the point.

[stackghost]

Do I really need to waste my time explaining why age-gating hands is not feasible, realistic, or even worth considering?

Really?

[antonvs]

You should look up the word "analogy".

Do I really need to waste my time explaining why age-gating the internet is not feasible, realistic, or even worth considering?

Really?

[jswelker]

I thought it was witty and clever.

[Cytobit]

Ad hominem attacks can't be much better.