[leobg]

I wouldn’t be surprised if that was the exact reaction the NYT was going for with this article.

(In marketing and propaganda, you first define what you want your reader to conclude. Then, you write a story that leads to that conclusion - though without actually mentioning it yourself. This makes the reader think it was their own thought.)

Maybe I’m overly paranoid. But y’all know the saying. Fool me once…

[tim333]

Having spent a while in South Africa, there seems a certain slant to the article in that the fail to mention that power was cheap and reliable under the white government and people are being forced to solar after Eskom semi collapsed under the corrupt ANC lot.

[belviewreview]

Is it your view that this set of ideas is mistaken? If so, kindly present some arguments.

Or perhaps you know they are correct but don't want to admit it, so you are trying to divert people's attention from the ideas to the question of the NYT'S intentions.