|
|
|
|
|
|
by pc86
4992 days ago
|
|
|
Why are people like you incapable of having a debate about something on its merits, instead relying on straw man arguments and attacks? > So we should do away with all regulation then? The parent didn't say that and nobody outside of the former Paul campaign has ever suggested. This is exactly what I'm talking about. > Anyway we can sort out the details ... after the election Stop using month-old Democratic talking points for your arguments and maybe people would take you more seriously. > Plenty of nations ... have implemented national schemes ... and none of them suffer from the stuff that you read about coming from the right's bullshit machine. So there it is, the right's "bullshit machine" as you put it. Let's ignore the fact that the US is several times the size of any western European country, much less homogenous and with a greater income disparity even between the 2nd and 4th quintiles. But yes, because it works for 62 million Britons, clearly if someone doesn't think it will work for 312 million Americans they (a) are racist; (b) are stupid; (c) hate poor people; (d) all of the above. |
|
|
It's implied. It's what always comes after that part. I nipped it in the bud. You're welcome.
> Stop using month-old Democratic tal...
You're an idiot.
> But yes, because it works for 62 million Britons, clearly if someone doesn't think it will work for 312 million Americans they (a) are racist; (b) are stupid; (c) hate poor people; (d) all of the above.
I agree.