Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mmh0000 177 days ago
True but. There's a huge trade-off in time management.

I can spend hours OCDing over my git branch commit history.

-or-

I can spend those hours getting actual work done and squash at the end to clean up the disaster of commits I made along the way so I could easily roll back when needed.

1 comments

it's also very easy to rewrite commit history in a few seconds.
If I'm rewriting history ... why not just squash?

But also, rewriting history only works if you haven't pushed code and are working as a solo developer.

It doesn't work when the team is working on a feature in a branch and we need to be pushing to run and test deployment via pipelines.

> But also, rewriting history only works if you haven't pushed code and are working as a solo developer.

Weird, works fine in our team. Force with lease allows me to push again and the most common type of branch is per-dev and short lived.