|
|
|
|
|
by mrexcess
171 days ago
|
|
Disagree wholeheartedly. The only relevant litmus test is: "Did the accused party commit the offense they are accused of?" ...everything else is whataboutism, red herring, ad hominem, and DARVO. If the worlds worst person says 2+2=4, you still can't evaluate that claim by testing how many people like or hate the person. Only by whether the content of their words is true or false. |
|