|
|
|
|
|
|
by albert_roca
165 days ago
|
|
|
- Why 4? It's not random. It is derived from the structural constant w = 2 as a topological constraint of the three-dimensional topology. Radius scales as w^2 = 4. - Why tetrahedron? Mass is defined as volume. The tetrahedron is the simplest closed 3D volume. Mathematically, the derived proton radius corresponds to the exact geometric circumradius (edge · √6 / 4) of this volumetric structure. - Why α / 4 · π? It represents the linear interaction cost (α) distributed over the spherical solid angle (4 · π) of the protonic surface. - Incorrect QED terms? The model explicitly and intentionally diverges from QED. It doesn't treat particles as points, but as three-dimensional objects. The model excludes the notion of physical infinities or singularities. - Why α^2 / 12? It derives from nodal friction distributed over the 12 vertices of the lepton's icosahedral topology. - Why α^3/5? It derives from the local 5-fold symmetry of the icosahedral node. The criticisms fail to identify that the model presents a first-principles framework where these numbers are geometric consequences, not free parameters. The model is not intended to be orthodox, but mathematically and geometrically coherent. |
|
|