[FunnyLookinHat]

Anyone else surprised that the download links are plain HTTP without SSL? I know it's a page that in the past I would have typically not worried about securing - but nowadays it's SSL everything or else your browser yells at you.

[maxmcd]

Quite surprising. It does seem like you can get an https download with

    aws s3 cp --no-sign-request s3://download.opencontent.netflix.com/sparks/creative-commons-attribution-4-intl-public-license.txt .

Which is hitting the bucket path route at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/download.opencontent.netflix.com/sp...

"aws s3 ls" similarly requests: https://s3.amazonaws.com/download.opencontent.netflix.com?li...

[ronbenton]

Yeah, this is bad. The page almost seems like someone’s pet project that didn’t have any explicit funding and they got bored or left Netflix in 2020. I’m not sure how that would explain the lack of SSL cert except for just general lack of thoroughness.

[reddalo]

> The page almost seems like someone’s pet project that didn’t have any explicit funding

It probably is, given that it's just a static page hosted on blogger.com

[gregoryl]

From the names mentioned in the most recent blog post, they left late 2022.

[therealdrag0]

Why is it bad tho?

[uyzstvqs]

I'm surprised they didn't use BitTorrent, with these HTTP links as web seeds. That'd make the most sense.

[alex_duf]

Politically it would be an interesting choice for Netflix to encourage people to use their BitTorrent clients..

But technically, you're right.

[abustamam]

I didn't even know Netflix had a bit torrent client!

[mrtksn]

The page look like zero effort given anyway, like one of the free templates you can find.

[robingchan]

this is hosted on s3 which doesn't support HTTPS, that said - if they used cloudfront in front of this bucket, they could save $$$ and have a SSL

[8organicbits]

S3 absolutely supports HTTPS. I think they set their bucket policy to forbid HTTPS. The whole thing is odd.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/exampl...

[robingchan]

so, isn’t this using the s3 static website hosting feature - (im assuming due to the dir listing) which i dont believe does support https