Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
fr0sty
4993 days ago
That traversal doesn't traverse. It just skip list to entry->next and would keep resetting.
You could do something like this instead:
link = &((*link)->next);
1 comments
nickkthequick
4993 days ago
Yes and then to set it would be
*link = (*link)->next;
link