|
|
|
|
|
by limagnolia
179 days ago
|
|
1) Software licenses are generally about copyright, though sometimes contain patent licensing provisions. Right now, there is significant legal debate on if training LLMs violates copyright or is fair use. 2) Most OSS licenses require attributeion, something LLM code generation does not really do. So IF training an LLM is restrctable by copyright, most OSS licenses practically speaking are incompatible with LLM training. Adding some text that specifically limits LLM training would likely run afould of the open source definitions freedom from discrimination principle. |
|