[mkj]

People in the industry would know that QNX has been around since the 90s (or 80s?) as a very solid embedded GUI platform. They're a company that doesn't need to prove their credentials.

I'd agree using qnx.software rather than qnx.com is kinda dumb though.

[ofrzeta]

Sure, it's been around 40 years, but it's not like old companies haven't changed owners many times. So, for instance, QNX is now part of Harman which is part of Samsung.

[ykl]

I thought that QNX was acquired by / is still developed by BlackBerry?

[ofrzeta]

Seems you are right. See how complicated it is? :)

[bflesch]

Indeed. And it has happened before that well-known brands change owners and suddenly push new products with certain risks attached for the user. That's all I wanted to point out, and for QNX it would be a very easy way to build trust by having this kind of information (or imprint) on their website.

[lmz]

So it's an elaborate front by South Korea instead.

[bflesch]

You're joking but the north korea intrusions are factually established and an ongoing security risk.