|
|
|
|
|
|
by maheshvaikri99
178 days ago
|
|
|
Ha, fair. CSV gets you 80% there. The 20% ISON adds:
- Multiple named tables in one doc
- Cross-table references
- No escaping hell (quoted strings handled cleanly)
- Schema validation (ISONantic) If you're stuffing one flat table into context, CSV works fine. When you have users + orders + products with relationships, ISON saves you from JSON's bracket tax. |
|
|