|
|
|
|
|
|
by jibal
179 days ago
|
|
|
> I mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term. > Need more of a citation to understand that..? This nonsense is not at all relevant to the claim for which I asked for a citation: "No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public." No support for that claim has ever been offered. |
|
|