[echion]

> I'm tired of this example everyone tests out, I think it undermines the researchers and engineers hard work.

It's completely valid, IMO. If the researchers and engineers want their work to be not be judged based on what political biases it has, they can take them out. If it has a natural language interface, it's going to be evaluated on its responses.

[written-beyond]

And risk their or their families lives?

Or what should they do, give up their careers?

[bigyabai]

> they can take them out

Basic informatics says this is objectively impossible. Every human language is pre-baked with it's own political biases. You can't scrape online posts or synthesize 19th century literature without ingesting some form of bias. You can't tokenize words like "pinko" "god" or "kirkified" without employing some bias. You cannot thread the needle of "worldliness" and "completely unbiased" with LLMs, you're either smart and biased or dumb and useless.

I judge models on how well they code. I can use Wikipedia to learn about Chinese protests, but not to write code. Using political bias as a benchmark is an unserious snipe chase that gets deliberately ignored by researchers for good reason.