| > There are a lot of reasons to not like Mozilla Correct. > but it's crazy to be against them for AI. Disagreed. > A browser is literally a user agent. In the same way that a car is literally just some wheels. It's overly-reductionist to the point of being adversarial. > What well-funded org should be entrusted with making an open source agent for the user instead? What does that have to do with the topic at hand? Maybe if you didn't try to strip the context (Mozilla, it's reputation, it's actions, it's incentives, and how this AI initiative conflicts with the userbase' expectations and references therein) all this would seem a lot less "crazy" even if you still disagree. Mozilla's users aren't being unreasonable or irrational for voicing criticisms here. Sure, there's plenty of blind-hate for AI. But even many of us that aren't don't like the way Mozilla is going about this for a number of very valid reasons/concerns well beyond "I don't like AI" |