Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tanaros 181 days ago
> The purpose of a federal government should be to grant rights, not restrictions.

If the federal government is about granting rights, does that imply the default state is “no rights”? That seems objectively worse.

1 comments

Individual states tend to take away rights. In the aforesaid approach, it's the job of the federal government to ensure they can't or don't.