| Hi everyone, author here! I’m genuinely blown away by all the interest in what started as a silly little experiment.
The project grew way beyond its original scope.
My initial curiosity was simply: how could you set up a pipeline to do automatic speed comparisons? I was less interested in the results as a definitive measure and more in the infrastructure challenge itself. But then the interest kept growing. I tried to modernize things, but one thing became quite notable: the difference between a language that gets actively optimized by its community (like Julia) versus one that just sits there unoptimized is striking. Honestly, I got overwhelmed. Managing all those implementations, keeping versions up to date, reviewing contributions—it was a lot. I basically tapped out for about a year. Now I’m back, and with AI assistance, maintaining this has become much more realistic—updating versions, helping optimize implementations, etc. That said, I’m always happy to accept contributions from folks who know their languages better than I do. Thank you all for your interest and the thoughtful discussion! |
This I like!
> … actively optimized … versus one that just sits there unoptimized is striking.
See N=50,000,000 nbody #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 jdk-23
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
> a silly little experiment
This I don't like.