|
|
|
|
|
by QuiEgo
182 days ago
|
|
> there’s just so much slop and garbage that hasn’t been thought through that it would be re-writing half of their PR If I were their tech lead I would make them do exactly that. Over and over until they got the point or they got a bad performance review and got PIPed out. The quality bar is the bar, and it's there for a reason (in my case, I work on security and safety critical stuff, so management has my back (usually)). I'm glad when people can use AI to help themselves. If it speeds them up, great. I don't care if it writes 100% of their code. They still are responsible for making sure it holds the quality bar. If they constantly submit code that doesn't meet the quality bar they have a performance problem regardless of the tools they used. |
|