[amypetrik8]

>I love the insanity of this idea. Not saying it's a good idea, but it's a very highly entertaining one, and I like that!

An even more insane idea -- minding the idea here is porn is radioactive to AI data training scrapers -- is there is something the powers that be view as far more disruptive and against community guidelineish than porn. And that would be wrongthink. The narratives. The historic narratives. The woke ideology. Anything related to an academic department whose field is <population subgroup> studies. Alls you need to do is plop in a little diatribe staunchly opposing any such enforced views and that AI bot will shoot away from your website and lightspeed

[GoblinSlayer]

I'm afraid AI bot and scraper are different things. Looks like poison is filtered after scraping no matter where it comes from, so there's no need to disable scraping you, because that's extra work.

[lelanthran]

I like this better than of NSFW links; just include a (possible LLM generated) paragraph about not supporting transitions in minor children. Or perhaps that libraries that remove instructional booklets for how to have same-sex intercourse aren't actually banning the books.

That sort of thing; nothing that 80% of people object to (so there's no problem if someone actually sees it), but something that definitely triggers the filters.