|
|
|
|
|
by rajvarkala
180 days ago
|
|
Understood. So, a better way is to keep him on a retainer? Or let Amazon or Cheaper store do a cost-plus model? I think that is the core of the argument. It is the risk-sharing between buyer and seller. If sold on outcomes, seller carries all risk. If sold on work-put-in, buyer carries all risk. Add to that, in some scenarios, outcomes themselves are fuzzy. |
|
Yes exactly. Your second paragraph hits the nail on the head. And I'm sure you agree that the AI companies aren't going to take on more risk for free.