|
|
|
|
|
|
by dpark
182 days ago
|
|
|
It can’t be both. If intelligence is this abstract and philosophical then the claims about inputs not being relevant for human intelligence are meaningless. It’s equally meaningless to say that constraints on LLM intelligence don’t apply to human intelligence. In the absence of a meaningful definition of intelligence, these statements are not grounded in anything. The term cannot mean something measurable or concrete when it’s convenient, but be vague and indefinable when it’s not. |
|
|