[lelanthran]

> I think the difference between the two is shrinking by the day. At this point I almost never need to address anything with the LLM's solution and could easily just go straight to testing for most things.

Do you believe that atrophy is not a real thing?

I've found that LLMs massively over-engineer things, regardless of the prompt used. How do you counter that without going back and forth at least a few times?

[Kiro]

I don't "believe" in anything. I'm just describing my situation, where I'm trying to find ways to improve the solutions but seldom find any. It's purely an observation and not me advocating for one thing or another.

I still check the output but it is starting to feel like a sanity check more than a code review.