[tim333]

I don't have a problem with the headline but the article is kind of bad.

And the headline is vague enough that you could read many meanings into it.

My take would be going back to Turing, he could see AI in the future was likely and the output of a Turing complete system is kind of a mathematical function - we just need the algorithms and hardware to crank through it which he thought we might have 50 years on but it's taken nearer 75.

The "intelligence did not get installed. It condensed" stuff reads like LLM slop.