Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by otterley 183 days ago
Typical defense against this is to mount all user-writable filesystems as `noexec` but unfortunately most OSes don't do that out of the box.
3 comments

It could have created a bash alias then. And I don't think a dev wants to be restricted in creating executables. Again, if a dev can do it, so can the malware.
I remember you could trivially circumvent that with „/lib/ld-linux.so <executable>“. Does that no longer work?
noexec now prevents mmaping files on that filesystem as executable.
Kinda hard to work as a software developer then.