[arcbyte]

Interesting ideas. Im very interested in database ideas that bring new capabilities or better ways to acconplish old ones.

W.r.t. query speeds on your columnar storage engine, you will obviously have much better writes that row oriented storage engines. This limits your write capabilities though. Any effort you put into restoring write speeds necessitates an extra step to the maintain the columnar stores - which puts you back into the group of databases naintaining indices that you criticize above.

I think modern databases are bringing new ideas on how to accelerate both write and query speeds simultaneously with tradeoffs around CAP.

[didgetmaster]

Although I have done many more benchmark testing against other databases for query speeds; I haven't noticed any significant speed degradation on writes.

Could you clarify what you mean by 'this limits your write capabilities'?

[arcbyte]

> W.r.t. query speeds on your columnar storage engine, you will obviously have much better writes that row oriented storage engines.

This should have said reads, not writes. Columnar storage takes significantly more effort to handle writes because it must do many more IOs across the different columns, potentially more de/compression cycles, etc.