|
|
|
|
|
by dinfinity
182 days ago
|
|
> My main point is that that distance x is going to rapidly get towards just a few miles away from point of use very shortly. That seems physically unlikely to me. Sure, burying and maintaining cables costs money, but other than that transferring energy in a very fundamental and solid state way is going to be much easier than packaging it up and transporting it with heavy machinery. This is definitely a case where your argument only works if it is supported by the actual calculation. |
|