Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by timeon 188 days ago
Article is about C. So non-GC memory safe language, as first, choice makes sense here.
1 comments

Not really, there are tons of software written in C that should have never came close to a C compiler in first place.

Even the UNIX and C authors agree with this, given what they worked on, in OS design and programming languages post C.

Something that many glance over, what have their UNIX idols actually done after UNIX System V.

Thus the first question already is that kernel code or not, and if not, why should it be written in C versus any other safer alternative.

Actual reasons like performance numbers required by the application, or existing SDK availability, not the "because I like it".