|
|
|
|
|
by sdoering
4996 days ago
|
|
In studies like these you can only look for correlation, not causation. But you can look for other factors, so to eliminate some theories. here for example the socialization-hypothesis. So it seems, that they have found a way to debunk the theory, that more violent teens tend to play more violent videogames. they controlled for pre-playing aggression-levels, and they monitored the developement of aggression over a longer period of time, to see, if the level of aggression changed (as it seems to do), when playing violent games. So yes, the can only show a more or less strong correlation between these two factors (and there might be a lot of other factors not controlled for), but they can show, that some other hypothesis does not explain the data. not more - but not less either. |
|
A non-causal association would have to be induced by a confounding factor that first causes teens to play violent video games then to behave aggressively, but never in the other order.
The causal effect is reinforced by the dose effect in the context of this temporal sequence, i.e. the more hours they play per day, the more likely they are to behave aggressively.