[xnx]

I felt rage baited when he crossed out Jakob Nielsen and promoted Ed Zitron (https://youtu.be/1fZTOjd_bOQt=1852). Bad AI is not good UI, but objecting based on AI being "not ethically trained" and "burning the planet" aren't great reasons.

[array_key_first]

From an economic standpoint those are both very good reasons, because:

1. Burning the planet on your servers is expensive, offloading it to a client-side LLM is not.

2. Ethics means risk means you won't be SOC compliant, your legal department will be mad, your users will be mad, etc.

The current status-quo of a few giant LLMs on supercomputers operated by OpenAI and Google is basically destined to fail, in my eyes. At least from a business standpoint. Consumer stuff might be different.

[GaryBluto]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fZTOjd_bOQ&t=1852s You're missing the ampersand.

It's really strange how he spins off on this mini-rant about AI ethics towards the end. I clicked on a video about UI design.

[xnx]

Same. AI is absolutely the future of human computer interaction (exactly the article from Jakob Nielsen that he crossed out). Even the father of WIMP, Douglas Engelbart, thought it was flawed: ""Here's the language they're proposing: You point to something and grunt". AI finally gives us the chance to instruct computers as humans.