|
|
|
|
|
by akersten
194 days ago
|
|
> Yeah, the "but what about a human" argument doesn't really work here. Scale of data matters as always. And an Ai for kindle has the scale of 20 years of literature I haven't seen a convincing argument why not. There's millions of librarians with the knowledge of more than 20 years of literature under their belt. Why can they answer your questions about a book but the robot can't? |
|
Robots simply do not deserve the same consideration and the same rights that humans have
It's really that easy. Humans deserve more rights than inanimate objects