[whynotmaybe]

> I decided to implement this in the C programming language as it’s by far the fastest language on the planet to this day (thanks to the visionary genius Dennis Richie)

Am I lost? Aren't the compiler/linker responsible for fast code, not the language itself?

[bluGill]

There are language issues as well. 99% of C programs are valid C++, and if you compile with a C++ compiler instead of a C++ compiler will be slightly faster! C++ ha a stronger type system and so once in a while (very rarely) those C programs compile but give incorrect results since C++ allowed the optimizer to make an assumption that wasn't true. Fortran is often even faster because the language allows for even more assumptions. I don't know where Rust fits in here (Rust is hurt today because the better optimizes are designed for C++ and so don't take advantage of extra assumptions Rust allows - it was designed to allow different assumptions from C++ and likely could be better would a ground up optimizer but that would take a large team a decade+ to write: expensive)

Most of the difference in speed is the optimizer/linker. Assuming a fair competition the difference between Ada, C, C++, D, Fortran, Rust, Zig (and many others I can't think of) is very rarely even 1% in any real world situation. Of course it isn't hard add pessimization to make any language lose, sometimes accidentally, so fair competitions are very hard to find/make.

Then again, the article was clearly sarcastic.

[mbivert]

> I decided to use the slowest language on the planet, Python (thanks to the visionary genius of Ross van der Gussom).

given the article, it's fair to assume the author was joking around

that being said, the way the language is used and its ecosystem do contribute to the executable's efficiency. yet, given C's frugality, or the proximity between its instructions and the executed ones, it's not unfair to say that "C is fast"

[rcxdude]

Both, usually. A language's semantics can limit how much a compiler can speed up the language. Python, for example, is extremely difficult to make fast due to the fact that almost everything has the semantics of a hashmap lookup. C, in comparison, has relatively little in it that can't be mapped fairly straightforwardly to assembly, and then most of it can be mapped in a more difficult way to faster assembly.

[reedf1]

It's a wild statement for a few reasons; your observation is one of them.

[croes]

People often use language as synonym for the whole ecosystem including compiler and linker