|
|
|
|
|
|
by jseliger
5000 days ago
|
|
|
In response to Radley, who said: * It sounds great in theory but the previous example only saved < 200 bytes. That's not really optimization, that's overkill.* That's a fair point, but if you've got a site that's getting hundreds of thousands or millions of views, or a large number of thumbnails, the one-time effort to shrink image size might be worth it. |
|
|