[rvz]

> We use deterministic algorithms because we need control and predictability. A hallucination in a portfolio allocation is a non-starter for us.

At least with this project, there is a sense of reason when knowing when you need to use LLMs instead of throwing it everywhere where it is not needed.

> My question for this crowd: Are you fine with AI running your money if the UX is good? Or do you genuinely prefer a traditional, transparent algorithmic approach? What would actually get you to pull the trigger on a trade?

IANAL but I don't think you would want a liability risk if you are unable to explain why the AI malfunctioned when managing someone else's money. Given that LLMs really cannot be held to account, you likely need lots of disclaimers on your product so that the users know what they are interacting with.

On the other hand, If you can transparently explain why the AI is not functioning as expected, if something goes wrong then that is more trustworthy than: 'We don't know where your money went as the AI hallucinated the result by misreading a single digit in the data'.