[omnicognate]

> Software development jobs must be very diverse if even this anti-vibe-coding guy thinks AI coding definitely makes developers more productive.

As a Professor of English who teaches programming to humanities students, the writer has had an extremely interesting and unusual academic career [1]. He sounds awesome, but I think it's fair to suggest he may not have much experience of large scale commercial software development or be particularly well placed to predict what will or will not work in that environment. (Not that he necessarily claims to, but it's implicit in strong predictions about what the "future of programming" will be.)

[1] https://stephenramsay.net/about/

[godelski]

Hard to say but to back his claim that he was programming since the 90's his CV shows he was working on stuff that's clearly more than your basic undergraduate skill level since the early 2000's. I'd be willing to bet he has more years under his belt than most HN users. I mean I'm considered old here, in my mid 30's, and this guy has been programming most my life. Though that doesn't explicitly imply experience, or more specifically experience in what.

That said, I think people really under appreciate how diverse programmers actually are. I started in physics and came over when I went to grad school. While I wouldn't expect a physicist to do super well on leetcode problems I've seen those same people write incredible code that's optimized for HPC systems and they're really good at tracing bottlenecks (it's a skill that translates from physics really really well). Hell, the best programmer I've ever met got that way because he was doing his PhD in mechanical engineering. He's practically the leading expert in data streaming for HPC systems and gained this skill because he needed more performance for his other work.

There's a lot of different types of programmers out there but I think it's too easy to think the field is narrow.

[mikewarot]

>I'm considered old here, in my mid 30's

I'm 62, and I'm not old yet, you're just a kid. ;-)

Seriously, there are some folks here who started on punch cards and/or paper tape in the 1960s.

[wombatpm]

I played with punch cards and polystyrene test samples from the Standard Oil Refinery where my father worked in the early 70’s and my first language after basic was Fortran 77. Not old either.

[xk3]

I grew out of the leaking ether and basaltic dust that coated the plains. My first memories are of the Great Cooling, where the land, known only by its singular cyclopean volcano became devoid of all but the most primitive crystalline forms. I was there, a consciousness woven from residual thermal energy and the pure, unfractured light of the pre-dawn universe. I'm not old either.

[freeopinion]

30 years ago my coworkers called me Grandpa, so I get it both ways.

[godelski]

Thanks. I meant is more of in a joking way, poking fun at the community. I know I'm far too young to earn a gray beard, but I hope to in the next 20-30 years ;-) I still got a lot to learn till that happens

[Aeolun]

You wish, that gray beard sometimes appears in your late thirties.

[godelski]

Maybe. But also what I though was a gray beard in my early 20's is very different from what I think a gray beard is now. The number of those I've considered wizards decreased, and I think this should be true for most people. It's harder to differentiate experts as a novice, but as you get closer the resolution increases.

[jader201]

The more I know, the more I know I don’t know.

[tracker1]

Hit me pretty quickly after turning 40 (now 50)... in this last decade I've gone mostly bald and my facial hair is now mostly gray.

[techiferous]

> I'm considered old here, in my mid 30's,

The 30s is the first decade of life that people experience where there are adults younger than them. This inevitably leads people in their 30s to start saying that they are "old" even though they generally have decades of vigor ahead of them.

[xxs]

> I'm considered old here, in my mid 30

That's absolutely not true. It was awkwardly funny to read that.

[swiftcoder]

I've been the oldest guy on several teams in row now, starting in my early 30s. FAANG/startup culture skews very young

[pjmlp]

My first home computer was bought in 1986, before that the only electronics at home were Game & Watch handhelds, like Manhole.

I guess I am reaching Gandalf status then. :)

[anthk]

38 there. If you didn't suffer Win9x's 'stability', then editing X11 config files by hand, getting mad with ALSA/Dmix, writing new ad-hoc drivers for weird BTTV tuners reusing old known ones for $WEIRDBRAND, you didn't live.

[groovy2shoes]

the anxiety that i might fry my monitor by setting the wrong scan rate haunts me to this day

[72deluxe]

The squealing noise of a monitor in the wrong rate is a memorable noise etched in my brain.

[AceJohnny2]

> I mean I'm considered old here, in my mid 30's

sigh

[bojo]

I feel like a grandpa after reading that comment now.

[psychoslave]

This year my in-your-face-old-fart-moment was realising I was contributing to Wikimedia projects for longer than some fellow wikimedians existed. XD

[jjgreen]

I got a coat older than that (and in decent nick).

[LgWoodenBadger]

I used to tell the “kids” that I worked with that I have a bowling ball older than them.

[wombatpm]

I was greeted with blank stares by the kids on my team when they wanted to rewrite an existing program from scratch, and I said that will work for as well as it did with Netscape. Dang whippersnappers

[anthk]

I own 90's comic books and video games older than most Gen-Z users in HN.

[godelski]

But am I wrong? I am joking, but good jokes have an element of truth...

[omnicognate]

Depends what you mean by "old". If you mean elderly then obviously you're not. If you mean "past it" then it might reassure you to know the average expecting mother is in her 30s now (in the UK). Even if you just mean "grown up", recent research [1] on brain development identifies adolescence as typically extending into the early thirties, with (brain) adulthood running from there to the mid sixties before even then only entering the "early aging" stage.

For my part, I'm a lot older than you and don't consider myself old. Indeed, I think prematurely thinking of yourself as old can be a pretty bad mistake, health-wise.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65974-8

[godelski]

FWIW I doubt I'd consider you old were I to know your actual age. I still think I'm quite young

[AceJohnny2]

"inside every old person there is a young one wondering what happened."

[xupybd]

I assume you're on the younger end

[godelski]

No need to assume, I already told everyone my age

[xxs]

The assumption implies the median of the people's age who frequent HN is higher.

[AceJohnny2]

It'd be interesting the know the median age of HN commenters.

I guess the median age of YCombinator cohorts is <30 ?

[aswegs8]

Good news for you: average age on HN is 42

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33480849

[moron4hire]

That was such a strange aspect. If you will excuse my use of the tortured analogy of comparing programming to wood working, there are is a lot of talk about hand tools versus power tools, but for people who aren't in a production capacity--not making cabinets for a living, not making furniture for a living--you see people choosing to exclusively use hand tools because they just enjoy it more. There isn't pressure about "you most use power tools or else you're in self-denial about their superiority." Well , at least for people who actually practice the hobby. You'll find plenty of armchair woodworkers in the comments section on YouTube. But I digress. For someone who claims to enjoy programming for the sake of programming, it was a very strange statement to make about coding.

I very much enjoy the act of programming, but I'm also a professional software developer. Incidentally, I've almost always worked in fields where subtly wrong answers could get someone hurt or killed. I just can't imagine either giving up my joy in the former case or abdicating my responsibility to understand my code in the latter.

And this is why the wood working analogy falls down. The scale at which damage can occur due to the decision to use power tools over hand tools is, for most practical purposes, limited to just myself. With computers, we can share our fuck ups with the whole world.

[unsungNovelty]

Nicely put. The wood working analogy does work.

[replyifuagree]

Another key difference is that wood itself has built in visual transparency as to the goodness of the solution - as it is pretty easy to figure out that a cabinet is horrible (I do get that there are defects in wood joining techniques that can surface after some time due to moisture, etc - but still, lot of transparency out of the box). Software has no such transparency built in.

The advantage of hand coded solutions is that the author of the code has some sense of what the code really does and so is a proxy for transparency, vibe coded solutions not so much.

I mean, it is 2025 and still customers are the best detectors of bad software over all quality apparatus to date.

[moron4hire]

Now we have LLMs, the Medium Density Fiber Board of technology. Dice up all the text of the world into fine vectorized bits and reconstitute them into a flimsy construct that falls apart when it gets a little wet.

[Kostchei]

so what you are saying is that for production we should use AI, and hand code for hobby, got it. Lemme log back into the vpn and set the agents on the Enterprise monorepo /jk

[assimpleaspossi]

>As a Professor of English who teaches programming to humanities students

That is the strangest thing I've heard today.

[jaimie]

The world of the Digital Humanities is a lot of fun (and one I've been a part of, teaching programming to Historians and Philosophers of Science!) It uses computation to provide new types of evidence for historical or rhetorical arguments and data-driven critiques. There's an art to it as well, showing evidence for things like multiple interpretations of a text through the stochasticity of various text extraction models.

From the author's about page:

> I discovered digital humanities (“humanities computing,” as it was then called) while I was a graduate student at the University of Virginia in the mid-nineties. I found the whole thing very exciting, but felt that before I could get on to things like computational text analysis and other kinds of humanistic geekery, I needed to work through a set of thorny philosophical problems. Is there such a thing as “algorithmic” literary criticism? Is there a distinct, humanistic form of visualization that differs from its scientific counterpart? What does it mean to “read” a text with a machine? Computational analysis of the human record seems to imply a different conception of hermeneutics, but what is that new conception?

https://stephenramsay.net/about/

[steveklabnik]

Can confirm, I'm tangentially adjacent to that community at times. I almost went to grad school for it even!

[ykonstant]

This is fascinating.

[ngc248]

Exactly, I don't think ppl understand why programming languages even came about anymore. Lotsa ppl don't understand why a natural language is not suitable for programming and by extension prompting an LLM