[throwaway150]

> The issue is that prediction is "part" of the human thought process, it's not the full story...

Do you have a proof for this?

Surely such a profound claim about human thought process must have a solid proof somewhere? Otherwise who's to say all of human thought process is not just a derivative of "predicting the next thing"?

[bamboozled]

Use your brain and use an LLM for 6 months, you’ll work it out.

[gaigalas]

Let's go the other route.

What would change your mind? It's an exercise in feasibility.

For example, I don't believe in time travel. If someone made me time travel, and made it undeniable that I was transported back to 1508, then I would not be able to argue against it. In fact, no one in such position would.

What is that equivalent for your conviction? There must be something, otherwise, it's just an opinion that can't be changed.

You don't need to present some actual proof or something. Just lay out some ideas that demonstrate that you are being rational about this and not just sucking up to LLM marketing.

[blenderob]

> Use your brain and use an LLM for 6 months, you’ll work it out.

That's not a proof. Think harder about the questions people are asking you here.