[grouchy]

The gamelike progressive tutorial idea is interesting. But games have a fixed learning path. Professional tools don't generally have that linearity.

Doesn't that suggest the "curriculum" has to be personalized? And if it's personalized, aren't we back to something generative?

[averynicepen]

Yes, and that's the point. In my opinion, this is the perfect use case for generative AI, one that takes advantage of the strengths of the technology while avoiding its weaknesses.

The generative UI example in the article is an example of the complete opposite of this idea - obtuse implementation of generative AI where it creates more problems than solutions. Yes, there is value in the idea of personalized UI. But UI/UX derives a lot of its value from consistency, as the other comments in this thread have mentioned. Losing that in exchange for personalization is a huge net negative, in my opinion.