[andreygrehov]

Your arguments in a nutshell:

   1. Hitler gave Jews free stuff (technical truth used to mislead)
   2. Dead bear guy doesn’t care about looking like a clown
   3. Therefore the OBPV causality review must be deceptive sleight-of-hand

That's literally a conspiracy theory.

On Tylenol, FDA did add a "possible association" warning in Sept 2025 (RFK’s call), but even the new label says evidence is only _suggestive_, not proven. Poop analogy fits the anti side better: no, avoiding fever meds won't prevent autism, but it could harm pregnancies.

What exactly is the "important context"?

[ceejayoz]

The sleight of hand is pretending ten kids dying of a rare vaccine side effect is at all surprising when we gave it to billions of people.

Eating pretzels has a more dangerous safety profile than that. People choke to death.

[andreygrehov]

Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place? A stricter protocol does not dismiss the kids, right?

[ceejayoz]

> Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fda-officials-have-said...

"U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that since the start of the pandemic, more than 2,000 children age 18 and younger in the U.S. have died from COVID-19. Nearly 700, or about 33%, were less than 1 year old."

Given the effectiveness at preventing death, I'll happily trade 2,000 COVID deaths for 10 myocarditis deaths.

[andreygrehov]

Once again, stricter protocols don't dismiss anyone, they adapt to 2025 realities: near-zero child covid deaths monthly vs. rare vax risks. Under the new FDA framework, kids aren't denied shots; they just require a doctor's consult for personalized recs. Your framing sounds like full denial, which is false and amps up the fear.